Tabular presentation of the basic assumptions of the new-materialistic* inversion of idealistic dialectical paradigm
* "The chief defect of all hitherto existing (old, note by Vera Vratusa) materialism – that of Feuerbach included – is that the thing, reality, sensuousness, is conceived only in the form of the object or of contemplation, but not as sensuous human activity, practice, not subjectively. Hence, in contradistinction to materialism, the active side was developed abstractly by idealism – which, of course, does not know real, sensuous activity as such... The highest point reached by contemplative materialism, that is, materialism which does not comprehend sensuousness as practical activity, is contemplation of single individuals and of civil society...The standpoint of the old materialism is civil society; the standpoint of the new (materialism, note by Vera Vratusa) is human society, or social humanity....The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways; the point is to change it (Marx, 1845/1995)."
REFERENCES Marx, K. (1845/1995).Theses On Feuerbach. Marxists Internet Archive. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1845/theses/theses.htm ; Marx, K. Engels, F. (1848 February/2000). Manifesto of the Communist Party. Marxists Internet Archive. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/ ; Marx, K. (1850/1993). Introduction. A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy. Marxists Internet Archive. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1859/critique-pol-economy/preface.htm ; Marx,K )1867/1995-6) Afterward to the Second Second German Edition, 1873. Capital I. Marxists Internet Archive. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/pdf/Capital-Volume-I.pdf ASSIGNMENT: Based on the proposed textbook and source literature and the ones you find, modify, supplement and / or elaborate the basic оntological, еpistemological and practical assumptions of typical advocates of the new-materialistic inversion of idealistic dialectical paradigmatic approach to examination of the problems of cognition and knowledge. Do you have a proposition for the more simple naming of this sociology of knowledge research paradigm , provided that in the title remains announced its intertwined basic theoretical and methodological characteristic, without using the last names of the founders of historical materialistic theory and inverted Hegel’s dialectical method? |